Note [Data Constructor Naming]

Each data constructor C has two, and possibly up to four, Names associated with it:

                   OccName   Name space   Name of   Notes
 
 The "data con itself"   C     DataName   DataCon   In dom( GlobalRdrEnv )
 The "worker data con"   C     VarName    Id        The worker
 The "wrapper data con"  $WC   VarName    Id        The wrapper
 The "newtype coercion"  :CoT  TcClsName  TyCon

EVERY data constructor (incl for newtypes) has the former two (the
data con itself, and its worker.  But only some data constructors have a
wrapper (see Note [The need for a wrapper]).

Each of these three has a distinct Unique.  The "data con itself" name
appears in the output of the renamer, and names the Haskell-source
data constructor.  The type checker translates it into either the wrapper Id
(if it exists) or worker Id (otherwise).

The data con has one or two Ids associated with it:

The "worker Id", is the actual data constructor.
* Every data constructor (newtype or data type) has a worker

* The worker is very like a primop, in that it has no binding.

* For a *data* type, the worker *is* the data constructor;
  it has no unfolding

* For a *newtype*, the worker has a compulsory unfolding which
  does a cast, e.g.
        newtype T = MkT Int
        The worker for MkT has unfolding
                \\(x:Int). x `cast` sym CoT
  Here CoT is the type constructor, witnessing the FC axiom
        axiom CoT : T = Int

The "wrapper Id", \$WC, goes as follows

* Its type is exactly what it looks like in the source program.

* It is an ordinary function, and it gets a top-level binding
  like any other function.

* The wrapper Id isn't generated for a data type if there is
  nothing for the wrapper to do.  That is, if its defn would be
        \$wC = C